Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
techtalk:evo:carb01 [2019/10/17 21:37] hippysmack [Sub Documents] |
techtalk:evo:carb01 [2019/10/18 00:27] hippysmack [Sub Documents] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 483: | Line 483: | ||
| There is no need to take it off the bracket for this. You just want to create enough resistance to keep the knob from pulling in on it's own. \\ | There is no need to take it off the bracket for this. You just want to create enough resistance to keep the knob from pulling in on it's own. \\ | ||
| **Caution**, the plastic nut fits onto plastic threads and should not be tightened too much or the threads will strip. \\ | **Caution**, the plastic nut fits onto plastic threads and should not be tightened too much or the threads will strip. \\ | ||
| - | |||
| {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_3_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_2_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) | {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_3_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_2_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) | ||
| {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_4_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) \\ | {{:techtalk:evo:carb:enrichener_cable_4_by_hippysmack.jpg?direct&300|}} ((photo by Hippysmack)) \\ | ||
| + | If the plastic nut has stripped out, you can cut a piece of rubber tubing, slit it long ways and stick it between the nut and the knob when needed. ((cantolina of the XLFORUM http://xlforum.net/forums/showthread.php?t=447983)) \\ | ||
| + | Then when you remove it, slip it on my throttle cable until the next cold startup. \\ | ||
| ====== Discrepancies in the FSM(s) / Parts Catalog(s) ====== | ====== Discrepancies in the FSM(s) / Parts Catalog(s) ====== | ||
| Upon perusing 1986-2006 Parts Catalogs for carburetor information, it's clear that the MoCo was trying to save space in these books at the expense of legibility. Below is a chart showing the initial intentions on the top and the MoCo's mis-interpretations on the bottom. They give no notations (from year to year book) on any changes to the nomenclature. I.E. one way to display a year/ model number is displayed differently in other year books. This chart is not complete nor factual in numbering but as an example only. | Upon perusing 1986-2006 Parts Catalogs for carburetor information, it's clear that the MoCo was trying to save space in these books at the expense of legibility. Below is a chart showing the initial intentions on the top and the MoCo's mis-interpretations on the bottom. They give no notations (from year to year book) on any changes to the nomenclature. I.E. one way to display a year/ model number is displayed differently in other year books. This chart is not complete nor factual in numbering but as an example only. | ||
