Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
techtalk:ih:engmech04a [2019/06/14 19:19]
hippysmack [Pros and Cons of Functionality]
techtalk:ih:engmech04a [2019/06/14 19:23] (current)
hippysmack [Pros and Cons of Functionality]
Line 47: Line 47:
 The pushrods have enough trouble with harmonics without adding another place for the valve train to flex. ((mrmom9r of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​t=1682099&​highlight=splitting+rocker+box)) \\ The pushrods have enough trouble with harmonics without adding another place for the valve train to flex. ((mrmom9r of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​t=1682099&​highlight=splitting+rocker+box)) \\
 I've seen flex as high as .025" just rolling an engine with big valve springs over on the bench. \\ I've seen flex as high as .025" just rolling an engine with big valve springs over on the bench. \\
 +If we lose up to .025" or more due to box flex, that is that much less that the valve is opening. ((Monte03 of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​t=1682099&​highlight=splitting+rocker+box&​page=2)) \\
 +So much for your hi lift cam. \\
  
 Even on dead stock valve train the naked eye can actually see the pushrod end of split boxes flex when pushing the kicker thru. ((DR DICK of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​t=1719533&​highlight=splitting+rocker+box&​page=2)) \\ Even on dead stock valve train the naked eye can actually see the pushrod end of split boxes flex when pushing the kicker thru. ((DR DICK of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​t=1719533&​highlight=splitting+rocker+box&​page=2)) \\