Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Previous revision | ||
techtalk:ref:svcproc11a [2019/01/09 03:38] |
techtalk:ref:svcproc11a [2019/05/19 21:56] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
====== Associated Transmission Wear ====== | ====== Associated Transmission Wear ====== | ||
+ | Worn dogs: \\ | ||
+ | The gear dogs can wear on the sides. ((mikeLI_77 of the XLFORUM http://xlforum.net/forums/showthread.php?t=2072870)) | ||
+ | They will sometimes become rounded off instead of being flat on the edges. \\ | ||
+ | This can cause the gears to not sync 100% and pop out of gear. \\ | ||
+ | | Worn dogs ((photo by aswracing of the XLFORUM http://xlforum.net/forums/showthread.php?t=2072870)) || | ||
+ | |{{:techtalk:ref:svcproc:worn_dogs_1_by_aswracing.jpg?direct&300|}}|{{:techtalk:ref:svcproc:worn_dogs_2_by_aswracing.jpg?direct&300|}}| | ||
* It seems all the shift forks had side wear marks (which may not be a problem but more of a symptom) but the inside contact surfaces on some have smash marks from the edges. At this point, I would replace the middle one since there is a wave of wear on the inside surface where it should contact the gears. Worn contact area equals more space between it and the gears than intended which adds to slop. | * It seems all the shift forks had side wear marks (which may not be a problem but more of a symptom) but the inside contact surfaces on some have smash marks from the edges. At this point, I would replace the middle one since there is a wave of wear on the inside surface where it should contact the gears. Worn contact area equals more space between it and the gears than intended which adds to slop. |