Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
techtalk:evo:engmech04b [2019/07/28 02:08]
hippysmack [Spring Clearance]
techtalk:evo:engmech04b [2021/07/02 03:01]
hippysmack [Check the shaft fit in the rocker cover]
Line 11: Line 11:
 If problems are found, below are some examples of how those have been addressed. \\ If problems are found, below are some examples of how those have been addressed. \\
 ====== Clearancing the Rocker Boxes ====== ====== Clearancing the Rocker Boxes ======
 +Rocker shaft to Rocker box clearance for all XL’s is 0.0007” to 0.0022”. ((2000 MMI Documents)) \\
 +
 High lift cams or changes in the valve springs can cause contact in the rocker box. ((Scuba10jdl of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​p=5601873&​highlight=rocker+wear#​post5601873)) \\ High lift cams or changes in the valve springs can cause contact in the rocker box. ((Scuba10jdl of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​p=5601873&​highlight=rocker+wear#​post5601873)) \\
 When you have high lift cams, as the rockers push your valves open they are also putting a sideways pressure on the valve stems. ((mikeLI_77 of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​p=5601873&​highlight=rocker+wear#​post5601873)) \\ When you have high lift cams, as the rockers push your valves open they are also putting a sideways pressure on the valve stems. ((mikeLI_77 of the XLFORUM http://​xlforum.net/​forums/​showthread.php?​p=5601873&​highlight=rocker+wear#​post5601873)) \\
Line 291: Line 293:
   * Per the specs in the FSM; \\ Shaft fit in rocker cover (loose) \\ New Install .0007” - .0022“ (.018 mm - .056 mm) \\ Wear Limits .0035” (.089 mm) \\ There was not enough clearance on one side (as the dims show in the pic below). \\   * Per the specs in the FSM; \\ Shaft fit in rocker cover (loose) \\ New Install .0007” - .0022“ (.018 mm - .056 mm) \\ Wear Limits .0035” (.089 mm) \\ There was not enough clearance on one side (as the dims show in the pic below). \\
  
-|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​oil:​inspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_1_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​oil:​inspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_2_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​engmech:​inspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_7.2_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|+|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​oil:​inspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_1_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​oil:​inspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_2_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|{{:​techtalk:​evo:​engmech:​AAAinspecting_rocker_box_shaft_bore_7.2_by_hippysmack.jpg?​direct&​300|}}|
  
   * The Jims reamer (94804-57) was used to run through the loose side to square up the hole for reaming on the other. \\ A 12-point 12 mm socket was used as a finger hold to turn the reamer in by hand. \\ (turning slowly by hand to let the reamer do the cutting)   * The Jims reamer (94804-57) was used to run through the loose side to square up the hole for reaming on the other. \\ A 12-point 12 mm socket was used as a finger hold to turn the reamer in by hand. \\ (turning slowly by hand to let the reamer do the cutting)